Shelley v. Arrow Motors, Inc.
Michael SHELLEY, Defendant/Respondent v. ARROW MOTORS, INC., Third Party
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
ORDER PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict for plaintiff in a fraudulent misrepresentation case. There is sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict. No error of law appears.
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.