TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Slaughter v. Director of Revenue

Rocky Dixon SLAUGHTER, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE

Slaughter v. Dir. of Revenue, 997 S.W.2d 132 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Missouri Court of Appeals · State Appellate Courts
Decided
August 17, 1999
Docket
No. 22685
Judges
Garrison, Montgomery, Prewitt
Citations
997 S.W.2d 1321999 Mo. App. LEXIS 13171999 WL 619010

Opinion of the Court — Prewitt

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

JAMES K. PREWITT, Judge.

Following Plaintiffs arrest for driving while intoxicated, his driver’s license was revoked for refusing to take a breath test. Thereafter he sought judicial review under Section 577.041, RSMo Supp.1997. When Defendant did not file an answer within the time ordinarily allowed, a default judgment was entered requiring that Defendant reinstate Plaintiffs driver’s license. Defendant appeals. 1

Judicial review under Section 577.041 does not require the Director of *133 Revenue to file an answer or other responsive pleadings. Nguyen v. Director of Revenue, 900 S.W.2d 238, 239 (Mo.App. 1995); Gothard v. Spradling, 586 S.W.2d 443, 446 (Mo.App.1979). See also Dudley v. Director of Revenue, 926 S.W.2d 943, 944 (Mo.App.1996); Daus v. Director of Revenue, 840 S.W.2d 892, 893 (Mo.App. 1992).

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

GARRISON, C.J., and MONTGOMERY, P.J., concur.

. Respondent has not filed a brief. "While there is no penalty prescribed for the failure to file a brief, we are required to decide the case without the benefit of that party’s authorities and points of view.” Fitzgerald v. Director of Revenue, 922 S.W.2d 478 , 479 n. 3 (Mo.App.1996).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2011: 12012: 22016: 120112026peak 2012 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State ex rel. Director of Revenue v. Carter386 S.W.3d 781 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
  2. Declue v. Director of Revenue361 S.W.3d 465 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
  3. Taylor L. Shomaker v. Director of Revenue504 S.W.3d 84 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)
  4. Satterlee v. County of Douglas354 S.W.3d 658 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

Most recent

  1. Taylor L. Shomaker v. Director of Revenue504 S.W.3d 84 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)
  2. State ex rel. Director of Revenue v. Carter386 S.W.3d 781 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
  3. Declue v. Director of Revenue361 S.W.3d 465 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
  4. Satterlee v. County of Douglas354 S.W.3d 658 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Fitzgerald v. Dir. of Revenue, 922 S.W.2d 478 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996) 22
Gothard v. Spradling, 586 S.W.2d 443 (Mo. Ct. App. 1979) 14
Minh Nguyen v. Dir. of Revenue, 900 S.W.2d 238 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995) 10
Daus v. Dir. of Revenue, 840 S.W.2d 892 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992) 9
Dudley v. Dir. of Revenue, 926 S.W.2d 943 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list