TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dominic Paolillo, Lucy Wadsworth and Robert F. Grady v. Dresser Industries, Inc.

Dominic PAOLILLO, Lucy Wadsworth and Robert F. Grady, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DRESSER INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee

Paolillo v. Dresser Indus., 884 F.2d 707 (2d Cir. 1989)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 13, 1989
Docket
No. 88-7527
Judges
Feinberg, Meskill, Kearse
Citations
884 F.2d 7071989 WL 105792

Opinion

The order entered in the above referenced appeal on February 15, 1989, erroneously failed to include language amending the opinion. At the direction of the panel, that order is now amended to include the following two paragraphs:

It is further ordered that the opinion be amended in the following respect:

At slip op. 797, last line ( 865 F.2d 37, 40 , second column, line 21)

— delete “significant contributing” before “factor” and add “that made a difference” after “factor”.

SO ORDERED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1989: 11991: 21997: 22013: 12014: 119892026peak 1991 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Paolillo v. Dresser Indus., 865 F.2d 37 (2d Cir. 1989) 21

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list