TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hudson v. State

Hudson v. State.

Hudson v. State, 1953 OK CR 5, 252 P.2d 934
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 7, 1953
Docket
No. A-11669
Judges
Jones, Brett, Powell
Citations
252 P.2d 9341953 OK CR 596 Okla. Crim. 2661953 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 157
Syllabus
(Syllabus.) Appeal and Error — Automobiles — Judgment of Jury Upon Disputed Questions of Fact Sustained. Criminal Court of Appeals will not substitute its judgment for that of the jury upon disputed questions of fact.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Jones

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

JONES, J.

The defendant, Otis Henry Hudson, was charged by an information filed in the county court of Kiowa county with driving a Ford pickup truck on the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; was tried; convicted; and pursuant to the verdict of the jury was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and costs, and has appealed.

No brief has been filed on behalf of the defendant and no appearance was made in his behalf at the time the case was regularly assigned for oral argument.

We have examined the record for fundamental error and none has been found. The proof of the state showed that the accused while driving a Ford pickup southeast of the city of Hobart on Highway No. 183 near Babbs Switch collided with a truck being driven by Floyd C. Friese, which was loaded with hogs and parked off of the pavement. The proof of the state showed the accused was intoxicated.

The accused testified in his own behalf and denied that he was intoxicated, but admitted that he had drunk some beer with a companion whom he had taken to the town of Snyder. Accused testified he was returning from Snyder in the pickup and his lights were flashing on and off when he collided with the truck.

The evidence raised an issue for the determination of the jury. Their judgment on such disputed question of fact will be sustained. The judgment and sentence of the county court of Kiowa county is affirmed.

BRETT, P. J., and POWELL, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list