TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. McFee

Wilcox Oil & Gas Co. v. McFee, 1946 OK 330, 174 P.2d 918
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
December 3, 1946
Docket
No. 32806
Judges
Hurst, Osborn, Bay-Less, Davison, Arnold
Citations
174 P.2d 9181946 OK 330198 Okla. 371946 Okla. LEXIS 670
Syllabus
(Syllabus.) WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION — Proceeding to review order or award — Dismissal of cross-appeal where cross-petition not filed within 20 days. Under the provisions of 85 O.S. 1941 § 29[ 85-29 ], it is necessary that a proceeding to review an order or award be filed within 20 days after a copy of such order or award is sent to the parties. Held, that a cross-petition must be filed within 20 days after such an order or award is sent, and where said cross-petition is not filed within the time provided by statute, any proceeding based thereon will be dismissed.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

PER CURIAM.

This is a proceeding by the petitioners, Wilcox Oil & Gas Company and Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Company, to review an award made by the State Industrial Commission in favor of Leonard McFee. The order from which the proceeding is prosecuted was entered on the 20th day of May, 1946. The Secretary of the State Industrial Commission certified that a copy of said order was sent to the parties affected on the same date.

A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that the cross-petition of Leonard McFee was not filed until October 7, 1946. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. In Hurley v. State Highway Commission, 186 Okla. 79 , 96 P. 2d 301 , we held that under the provisions of 85 O.S. 1941 §29, and original proceeding to vacate an award of the State Industrial Commission must be commenced within 20 days after a copy of such award' of decision has been sent by the commission to the parties affected. The filing of a cross-petition in error is a new proceeding, and in order to maintain the errors alleged in any such cross-petition it is necessary to comply with the statutory provisions with relation to petitions in error. Board of County Commissioners of Kiowa County v. Kiowa National Bank, 166 Okla. 255 , 27 P. 2d 338 .

The cross-petition in error of Leonard McFee is dismissed.

HURST, V.C.J., and OSBORN, BAY-LESS, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1947: 11965: 11978: 119472026peak 1947 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bledsoe v. Munsingwear Corp.1978 OK 79, 579 P.2d 835
  2. Smith v. State Industrial Court1965 OK 179, 408 P.2d 317
  3. Trailmobile Co. v. Ray1947 OK 170, 180 P.2d 1005

Most recent

  1. Bledsoe v. Munsingwear Corp.1978 OK 79, 579 P.2d 835
  2. Smith v. State Industrial Court1965 OK 179, 408 P.2d 317
  3. Trailmobile Co. v. Ray1947 OK 170, 180 P.2d 1005

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Bd. of Com'rs of Kiowa Cnty. v. Kiowa Nat'l Bank of Snyder, 1933 OK 630, 27 P.2d 338 5
Hurley v. State Highway Comm'n, 1939 OK 505, 96 P.2d 301 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list