Earl Jacob Cross v. Robert Thomas
Opinion
888 F.2d 1385 Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Earl Jacob CROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert THOMAS, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 89-6612.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 11, 1989. Decided Oct. 17, 1989.
Earl Jacob Cross, appellant pro se.
Richard Francis Gorman, III, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.
Before CHAPMAN, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
Earl Jacob Cross appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cross v. Thomas, C/A No. 88-123-H (W.D.Va. Apr. 11, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
2
AFFIRMED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.