TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Special Indemnity Fund v. George

Special Indem. Fund v. George, 1947 OK 131, 179 P.2d 919
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 23, 1947
Docket
No. 32336
Judges
Hurst, Davison, Osborn, Bayless, Welch, Corn, Gibson, Arnold
Citations
179 P.2d 9191947 OK 131198 Okla. 4571947 Okla. LEXIS 490
Syllabus
(Syllabus.) WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION — Subsequent injury to "physically impaired person" — Apportionment of liability between employer and Special Indemnity Fund. In making an award for multiple injuries under 85 O. S. Supp. 1943, § 172, the State Industrial Commission should find the percentum of total permanent disability suffered by the claimant as a result of all injuries received by him, and should also find the percentum of such permanent disability attributable to the specific injury last suffered. The award against the employer should be for the percentum of disability caused by the last injury and the remainder should be charged against the Special Indemnity Fund.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

■ PER CURIAM.

This is an original proceeding brought by Special Indemnity Fund of the State of Oklahoma, administered by the State Insurance Fund, to review an award against it made by the State Industrial Commission to A. E. George.

From the record it appears that George was injured on March 2, 1945, by falling from a platform some eight or ten feet high, injuring his right elbow and right thumb. At the time of the injury he was engaged in a hazardous occupation. Previous to the injury aboye mentioned he had received injuries to both hands, and as a result of all of said injuries suffered permanent disability. Testimony of physicians as to the extent of his permanent disability as the result of the combined injuries varied, ranging from total permanent disability to 73 per cent permanent partial disability.

Upon an appeal from the award made by the trial commissioner, the Industrial Commission, sitting en banc, after finding that the claimant was injured while engaged in a hazardous occupation, and the rate of compensation to which he was entitled, made the following findings:

“That at the time of said injury on March 2, Í945, to the right arm, the claimant was a ‘Physically Impaired Person’ under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, as a result of an injury in 1917 to the left hand; as a result of an injury in 1918 to his left hand; as a result of an injury in 1918 to his right hand, and that the combination of, ail of said injuries herein mentioned is materially greater than resulted from the injury of March 2, 1945, and thát as a result of said injuries, the claimant is now suffering from 80 per cent permanent partial disability to the right hand, and 35 per cent permanent partial disability to the left hand, which disabilities considered together constitute 57% per cent permanent partial disability to the body as a whole, and that the Special Indemnity Fund shall pay to claimant compensation for 287% weeks at $10.67 per week, or the total sum of $3,067.63.

“That as a result of the injury of March 2, 1945, to claimant’s right arm, he sustained 20 per cent permanent partial disability to said arm, for which he is entitled to compensation for 50 weeks at $10.67 per week, or the totál sum of $533.50, which award should be commuted to a lump sum and paid to the claimant herein.”

Petitioner complains that by the findings above set forth the Industrial Commission made a specific award against it for the injuries sustained by claimant prior to the injury received by him on March 2, 1945, and that the commission erred in so doing.. We.- think this contention is well taken.

In making an award for multiple in *458 juries, the commission should follow the method outlined in Special Indemnity Fund v. McMillin, 198 Okla. 412 , 179 P. 2d 475 , and from the competent evidence find the percentum of total permanent disability resulting from the combination of all injuries suffered’by claimant, and the percentum of such disability caused by the last injury. The employer would be liable only for the percentum of disability resulting from the last injury, and the remainder, after deducting the amount for which the employer is liable, should be charged against the Special Indemnity Fund. Special Indemnity Fund v. Farmer, 195 Okla. 262 , 156 P. 2d 815 ; Special Indemnity Fund v. Hobbs, 196 Okla. 318, 164 , P. 2d 980.

From the findings above set forth -it appears that in the instant case the Industrial Commission computed separately the permanent partial disability suffered by the claimant from his earlier injuries, for which it awarded compensation against the Special Indemnity Fund, and then computed the percentum of disability to claimant’s right arm due to the specific injury of March 2, 1945, for which it made a separate award against the employer. It made no finding as to the extent or percentum of total permanent disability resulting from all injuries combined.

The award is vacated, with instructions to the commission to consider the evidence anew and make an award to claimant based upon the percentum of total permanent disability sustained by him as a result of all his injuries, deduct therefrom the percentum of such disability it shall find is due to the injury of March 2, 1945, and make a proper award against the employer and the Special Indemnity Fund in accordance with the method above stated.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1948: 21949: 21953: 11959: 11974: 119482026peak 1948 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Special Indemnity Fund v. Wilson1959 OK 236, 348 P.2d 1072
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. Bramlett1949 OK 124, 206 P.2d 972
  3. Special Indemnity Fund v. Neal1948 OK 97, 192 P.2d 660
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. Drye1948 OK 4, 188 P.2d 359
  5. Bramlett v. Luper Transp. Co.258 P.2d 895 (Okla. 1953)
  6. Merrick v. Blackman1949 OK 150, 207 P.2d 942

Most recent

  1. Texas County Irrigation & Water Resources Ass'n v. Dunnett1974 OK 118, 527 P.2d 578
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. Wilson1959 OK 236, 348 P.2d 1072
  3. Bramlett v. Luper Transp. Co.258 P.2d 895 (Okla. 1953)
  4. Merrick v. Blackman1949 OK 150, 207 P.2d 942
  5. Special Indemnity Fund v. Bramlett1949 OK 124, 206 P.2d 972
  6. Special Indemnity Fund v. Neal1948 OK 97, 192 P.2d 660

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Special Indem. Fund v. Farmer, 1945 OK 47, 156 P.2d 815 28
Special Indem. Fund v. McMillin, 1947 OK 119, 179 P.2d 475 26
Special Indem. Fund v. Hobbs, 1945 OK 295, 164 P.2d 980 16

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list