TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gershon v. State

Bernard GERSHON, in Error v. The STATE of Oklahoma, in Error

Gershon v. State, 1967 OK CR 67, 426 P.2d 822
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 12, 1967
Docket
No. A-13911
Judges
Brett, Bussey, Nix
Citations
426 P.2d 8221967 OK CR 671967 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 276

Opinion of the Court — Bussey

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

BUSSEY, Judge.

Bernard Gershon, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, was charged in the District Court of Oklahoma County with the crime of Obtaining Money by means and use of a False and bogus check. He was tried by a jury, found guilty, and sentenced to Six (6) years in the Penitentiary. From that judgment and sentence he now attempts to appeal to this Court.

The State has filed a Motion to Dismiss, moving that this cause be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

It appears from the record that judgment and sentence was entered on the 23rd day of. July, 1965. Under the new statute, the defendant was required to give written notice of his intention to appeal, and request for casemade, in open court at the time judgment and sentence was entered, or within ten days thereafter. After said written notice of intent to appeal and request for casemade is given, defendant would automatically have Six (6) months from date of judgment and sentence to filé his appeal in a felony case in this Court. Title 22, Okl.St.Ann. §§ 1054, 1060, effective May 19, 1965.

This Court has repeatedly held that an appeal may be taken as a matter of right from a judgment of conviction, but that the manner of taking such appeal is a matter of legislative control, and the statute prescribing the manner in which an appeal can be taken is mandatory. See Masters v. State, Okl.Cr., 408 P.2d 801 . Inasmuch as no written notice of intent to appeal or request for casemade was given in the instant cause, this Court could not have acquired jurisdiction after August 2, 1965 (ten days after judgment and sentence) and the trial judge should have carried out the judgment at that time.

The Motion to Dismiss by the State is hereby Sustained, and the attempted appeal is dismissed.

BRETT, J., and NIX, P. J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1972: 119722026peak 1972 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Baker v. State1972 OK CR 114, 496 P.2d 1195

Most recent

  1. Baker v. State1972 OK CR 114, 496 P.2d 1195

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Masters v. State, 1965 OK CR 161, 408 P.2d 801 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list