Gettings v. Page
Cecil C. GETTINGS v. Ray PAGE, Warden
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
BRETT, Judge.
This action in habeas corpus was instituted by the petitioner, Cecil C. Gettings, in an effort to secure his transfer from the State Penitentiary, at McAlester, to- the State Reformatory at Granite, Oklahoma, or to be released from his confinement.
The verified petition states that in May, 1943 petitioner was sentenced to serve a term of life imprisonment at the Oklahoma State Reformatory at Granite, Oklahoma, and after serving fourteen years at Granite, he was transferred to the State Penitentiary at McAlester, where he received a new inmate number; and that he is entitled to be either returned to the Reformatory at Granite, or to be released from confinement.
Under the corrections act of 1967 (57 O.S.Supp. § 510(i)) the Director of the Department of Corrections is given authority to transfer prisoners from one institution under the control of the Department to another.
If petitioner was sentenced in 1943 and served fourteen years in the Reformatory at Granite, he was evidently transferred to the Penitentiary at McAlester in 1957. At that time the State Board of Public Affairs had authority to transfer inmates from one penal institution to another. Ex parte Allen, 86 Okl.Cr. 48 , 192 P.2d 289 ; Ex parte Olden, 88 Okl.Cr. 56 , 199 P.2d 228 ; *535 Ex parte Burns, 88 Okl.Cr. 270 , 202 P.2d 433 .
In the Olden case, supra, the Court wrote an extensive opinion and gave a complete review of the statutes pertaining to the management and control of all penal institutions up to the date of such opinion.
Under the authorities above stated, the demurrer of the Attorney General is sustained, and the petition is dismissed.
NIX, P. J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.