TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gettings v. Page

Cecil C. GETTINGS v. Ray PAGE, Warden

Gettings v. Page, 1968 OK CR 108, 442 P.2d 534
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 19, 1968
Docket
No. A-14722
Judges
Brett, Nix, Bussey
Citations
442 P.2d 5341968 OK CR 1081968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 462

Opinion of the Court — Brett

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

BRETT, Judge.

This action in habeas corpus was instituted by the petitioner, Cecil C. Gettings, in an effort to secure his transfer from the State Penitentiary, at McAlester, to- the State Reformatory at Granite, Oklahoma, or to be released from his confinement.

The verified petition states that in May, 1943 petitioner was sentenced to serve a term of life imprisonment at the Oklahoma State Reformatory at Granite, Oklahoma, and after serving fourteen years at Granite, he was transferred to the State Penitentiary at McAlester, where he received a new inmate number; and that he is entitled to be either returned to the Reformatory at Granite, or to be released from confinement.

Under the corrections act of 1967 (57 O.S.Supp. § 510(i)) the Director of the Department of Corrections is given authority to transfer prisoners from one institution under the control of the Department to another.

If petitioner was sentenced in 1943 and served fourteen years in the Reformatory at Granite, he was evidently transferred to the Penitentiary at McAlester in 1957. At that time the State Board of Public Affairs had authority to transfer inmates from one penal institution to another. Ex parte Allen, 86 Okl.Cr. 48 , 192 P.2d 289 ; Ex parte Olden, 88 Okl.Cr. 56 , 199 P.2d 228 ; *535 Ex parte Burns, 88 Okl.Cr. 270 , 202 P.2d 433 .

In the Olden case, supra, the Court wrote an extensive opinion and gave a complete review of the statutes pertaining to the management and control of all penal institutions up to the date of such opinion.

Under the authorities above stated, the demurrer of the Attorney General is sustained, and the petition is dismissed.

NIX, P. J., and BUSSEY, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1978: 119782026peak 1978 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Ex Parte Olden, 1948 OK CR 108, 199 P.2d 228 21
Ex Parte Burns, 1949 OK CR 11, 202 P.2d 433 15
Ex Parte Allen, 1948 OK CR 33, 68 S. Ct. 1333 7

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list