TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McGregor v. State

Billy Keith McGREGOR v. The STATE of Oklahoma

McGregor v. State, 1986 OK CR 144, 728 P.2d 846
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
September 24, 1986
Docket
No. F-84-483
Judges
Parks, Brett, Bussey
Citations
728 P.2d 8461986 OK CR 1441986 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 361

Opinion of the Court — Parks

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ORDER REMANDING FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING

The appellant, Billy Keith McGregor, was found guilty of First Degree Murder (21 O.S.1981, § 701.7) and sentenced to death in the District Court of Hughes County, Case No. CRF-83-58.

Prior to trial, defense counsel requested that a psychiatrist or psychologist be appointed to examine the appellant to evaluate the possibility of an insanity defense and to provide certain mitigating evidence concerning appellant’s mental condition. The motion was denied, apparently on the basis that the judge believed he was without authority to make such an appointment. Since then, the Honorable United States Supreme Court has declared that the federal constitution requires that the State, at a minimum, assure the defendant access to a competent psychiatrist if the defendant demonstrates to the trial judge that his sanity at the time of the offense is to be a significant factor at trial. Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 , 105 S.Ct. 1087, 1097 , 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985).

Although defense counsel did not make an exemplary record on this issue, appellate counsel has presented a substantial amount of evidence that leads this Court to believe there is a grave risk that the sanity issue was inaccurately resolved. See Ake, 105 S.Ct. at 1096 .

NOW THEREFORE, after considering the matters presented to this Court and being sufficiently advised in the premises, this Court finds that this appeal should be remanded to the Hughes County District Court for the purpose of conducting an evidentiary hearing to determine whether, under the holding of Ake , the appellant was entitled to a court-appointed psychiatrist.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ED PARKS, P.J. TOM BRETT, J. HEZ J. BUSSEY, J.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1990: 11994: 119902026peak 1990 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Washington v. State1990 OK CR 75, 800 P.2d 252 · Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part
  2. McGregor v. State885 P.2d 1366 (Okla. Crim. App. 1994)

Most recent

  1. McGregor v. State885 P.2d 1366 (Okla. Crim. App. 1994)
  2. Washington v. State1990 OK CR 75, 800 P.2d 252 · Concurring in Part, Dissenting in Part

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985) 2,672

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list