TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Farber

STATE of Oklahoma, ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. S. Richard FARBER

State ex rel. Okla. Bar Ass'n v. Farber, 1993 OK 129, 863 P.2d 1175
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 11, 1993
Docket
No. SCBD No. 3910
Judges
Hargrave, Hodges, Kauger, Lavender, Opala, Simms, Summers, Watt, Wilson
Citations
863 P.2d 11751993 OK 12964 O.B.A.J. 30941993 Okla. LEXIS 1551993 WL 404907

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the trial panel’s proposed stipulations of fact and conclusions of law with agreed recommendation of discipline, and upon a de novo review of the record in the above styled and numbered cause, THE COURT FINDS:

1) The respondent, S. Richard Farber (Farbér), is subject to discipline for failure promptly to deliver a client’s funds, to represent diligently his clients, to keep clients adequately informed of the status of their causes, and to respond to an inquiry in a disciplinary proceeding. Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.15, 8.1, 5 O.S.1991, App. 3-A and Rules 1.4 and 5.2, 5 O.S.1991, Ch. 1, App. 1-A.

2) The agreed recommendation for discipline presented by the complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar Association), provides for: a public reprimand; a two-year probation with active involvement in Alcoholics Anonymous and Lawyers Helping Lawyers; cooperation with the Bar Association concerning any future complaint; revocation of probation should the terms and conditions of the present discipline be violated; and imposition of costs.

3) The counts of professional misconduct outlined in paragraph “1)” support Imposition of discipline. Farber has practiced law for eighteen years with no previous disciplinary complaints having been lodged against him. He has voluntarily undertaken substantial steps to address and to resolve personal problems associated with his professional misconduct. Although Farber’s misconduct is serious, his prior service to his profession and to the public, supports leniency.

4) The appropriate discipline is: a public reprimand; a two-year probation with active involvement in Alcoholics Anonymous and Lawyers Helping Lawyers; cooperation with the Bar Association concerning any future complaint; revocation of probation should the terms and conditions of the present discipline be violated; and imposition of costs. Rule 6.16, 5 O.S.1991, Ch. 1, App. 1-A.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

1) S. Richard Farber is hereby publicly censured for his professional misconduct.

2) Farber’s continued ability to practice law is conditioned upon a two-year probation with active involvement in Alcoholics Anonymous and Lawyers Helping Lawyers, and cooperation with the Bar Association concerning any future complaint. Revocation of probation will result should the terms and conditions of the present discipline be violated.

*1176 3) The respondent pay the costs of this proceeding in the amount of $665.53 within thirty (30) days from the date of this order.

HODGES, C.J., and OPALA, ALMA WILSON, KAUGER, SUMMERS and WATT, JJ., concur. LAVENDER, V.C.J., and SIMMS and HARGRAVE, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1995: 12007: 12019: 119952026peak 1995 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list