People v. Williams
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
BRODERICK, J.
This appeal is here in the same condition as the appeal in People v. Woods, ante, p. 364, 16 Pac. 551 , just decided by this court. The facts are also similar, and a like verdict and judgment were obtained in the trial court.
We have in this case examined the record, and discovered no substantial error. The judgment of the district court is affirmed, and it is ordered that the judgment here be certified and remitted to the trial court, and said court is directed to make such order as may be necessary to carry its judgment into effect.
Hays, C. J., and Buck, J., concurring.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.