Hodgins v. Harris
HODGINS, Administrator v. HARRIS
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
HHSTON, J.
This is an action to foreclose a mortgage. At the end of the conclusions of law found by the district court, the following words appear: “It is ordered that, after deducting the payment to the sheriff, that the balance of the proceeds of sale be paid into court, and distributed, by and -through the clerk, in the foregoing order, and that judgment and decree be entered herein in accordance with the foregoing findings. Done in open court this eighth day of December,, *518 1894. [Signed] W. G. Piper, Judge.” This is not a judgment, as bas been repeatedly decided by this court, following uniform decisions of the supreme court of California upon identical statutes. (Durant v. Comegys, 3 Idaho, 67 , 35 Am. St. Rep. 267 , 26 Pac. 755 ; Gray v. Cederholm, 2 Idaho, 34 , 3 Pac. 12 ; Meysan v. Chabrie (Cal.), 7 Pac. 634 ; Stebbins v. Savage, 5 Mont. 253 , 5 Pac. 278 ; Gray v. Palmer, 28 Cal. 416 ; McNevin v. McNevin, 11 Pac. C. L. J. 92; Thomas v. Anderson, 55 Cal. 43 ; Schroder v. Schmidt, 71 Cal. 399 , 12 Pac. 302 ; and many others.) Appeal dismissed with costs.
Morgan, C. J., and Sullivan, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.