Tannahill v. Black
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
SULLIVAN, J.
The above-entitled case was submitted with that of Ponting v. Isaman, ante, p. 577, 65 Pac. 434 , and the decision in this case was to follow the decision in that. It is therefore ordered that the judgment be reversed, and that the cause be remanded, with instructions to the lower court to set aside said judgment and to enter judgment in favor of the appellant, dismissing this proceeding. Costs of this appeal are awarded to the appellant.
Stockslager, J., concurs.
Dissent
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
QUARLES, C. J.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion prepared by me in Ponting v. Isaman, ante, p. 577, 65 Pac. 434 , I dissent from the conclusion reached in this case. One feature appears in this case which does not exist in the Isaman case, and that is the fact that the appellant in this ease charged his expenses and six dollars per diem for time spent in going from his home to the county site and returning. This fact, to my mind, is contrary to the conclusion that “he honestly believed” that he was entitled to the fees that he charged and collected. The judgment in this case should be affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.