TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Baker v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation

BAKER v. OREGON RAILROAD AND NAVIGATION COMPANY

Baker v. Or. R.R. & Navigation, 66 P. 806 (Idaho 1901)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Idaho Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 23, 1901
Citations
66 P. 8068 Idaho 361901 Ida. LEXIS 47
Syllabus
Appeal — Undertaking—Sufficiency.—Where two appeals are taken and only one undertaking given, without reciting to which appeal it applies, the same is void for uncertainty,
Summary
APPEAL from District Court, Shoshone County.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per CURIAM.

— The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal from the judgment and the appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial, on the ground that no appeal bond was given on either appeal as required by law. The record shows that only one undertaking upon appeal was given, and this undertaking recites both appeals, and then undertakes that the appellant will pay “all damages and costs which may be awarded against the appellant on the appeal”; and this undertaking is void for uncertainty, as heretofore held by this court in numerous decisions. Appellant, recognizing the sufficiency of the grounds for respondent’s motion to dismiss, requests that the appeal be dismissed without prejudice, and that appellant be given leave to withdraw his transcript upon appeal.

Wherefore it is ordered that the said appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed, without prejudice to appellant’s rights, and that appellant be permitted to withdraw his printed transcript. The appellant to pay all costs of appeal.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1906: 11939: 11951: 119062026peak 1906 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Magee v. Whitacre96 P.2d 201 (Nev. 1939)
  2. Mikulich v. Carner228 P.2d 257 (Nev. 1951)
  3. Thum v. Bailey86 P. 279 (Idaho 1906)

Most recent

  1. Mikulich v. Carner228 P.2d 257 (Nev. 1951)
  2. Magee v. Whitacre96 P.2d 201 (Nev. 1939)
  3. Thum v. Bailey86 P. 279 (Idaho 1906)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list