TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fife v. Village of Glenns Ferry

W. A. FIFE v. VILLAGE OF GLENNS FERRY

Fife v. Vill. of Glenns Ferry, 146 P. 467 (Idaho 1915)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Idaho Supreme Court · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 8, 1915
Judges
Morgan, Sullivan
Citations
146 P. 46726 Idaho 7631915 Ida. LEXIS 11
Disposition
Affirmed.
Headnotes
Ejectment — Location of City Lot — Findings of Fact — Sufficiency of Evidence. 1. Held, that the evidence is sufficient to support the finding of facts.
Summary
APPEAL from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District for Elmore County. Hon. Edward A. Walters, Judge. Action in ejectment to recover possession of lot 9 and the west half of lot 10, block 21, Hammer’s addition to the village of Glenns Ferry. Judgment for the defendant.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Sullivan

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

SULLIVAN, C. J.

This is an action in ejectment to recover the possession of lot 9 and the west half of lot 10 in block 21 in Hammer’s addition to the town of Glenns Ferry.

The village of Glenns Ferry owns lot 8 in said block and has its city jail on said lot 8. The real controversy arises over the exact location of lot 9 and the west half of lot 10 in said block. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and finding of facts and judgment entered in favor of the village, from which judgment this appeal was taken.

The sole question presented for determination is where in the village of Glenns Ferry and in Hammer’s addition thereto lot 9 and the west half of lot 10 are located. After hearing the testimony of the civil engineer or surveyor on the part of the plaintiff and of the county surveyor on the part of the defendant, and some other testimony, the court made its findings and judgment as above stated.

*764 There are eight assignments of error, bnt they all go to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings.

After a careful examination of the evidence, we are satisfied that there is sufficient evidence in the record to support the findings of the trial court. The judgment must therefore be affirmed, and it is so ordered, with costs in favor of the respondent.

Morgan, J., concurs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list