Sun Studs, Inc. v. Ata Equipment Leasing, Inc., Applied Theory, Inc. And U.S. Natural Resources, Inc.
Opinion
892 F.2d 73
SUN STUDS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATA EQUIPMENT LEASING, INC., Applied Theory, Inc. and U.S. Natural Resources, Inc., Defendants/Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 87-1509, 87-1515.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Dec. 20, 1989.
1
Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Oregon.
2
Don H. Marmaduke, of Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke & Booth, Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Barbee B. Lyon, of Tonkon, Torp, Galen, Marmaduke & Booth, Portland, Or., and William A. Birdwell, of Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, Anderson & Young, Portland, Or.
3
David W. Axelrod, of Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Portland, Or., for defendants/cross-appellants. With him on the brief was Robert L. Harrington, of Portland, Or.
ORDER 4
Upon further consideration of the suggestion for rehearing in banc that was accepted on August 16, 1989, 882 F.2d 1583 , it now appearing that theacceptance was improvident, 5
IT IS ORDERED that the suggestion for rehearing in banc be, and the same hereby is, declined. The court's opinion issued on March 31, 1989, appearing at 872 F.2d 978 , as modified by order on July 3, 1989, 872 F.2d 994 , is reinstated.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.