Delap v. Lawson
ALEX DELAP v. OLA LAWSON and O. K. LAWSON
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
RICE, J.
This is an action upon a promissory note in which judgment was rendered for the defendants. The appeal is from the judgment.
The appellant mates but one specification of error, as follows:
‘ ‘ The court erred in rendering judgment against the plaintiff, the same not being supported by the evidence in the record.”
This assignment is very defective. (Caldwell v. Wells, 16 Ida. 459 , 101 Pac. 812 ; Newport Water Co. v. Kellogg, 31 Ida. 574 , 174 Pac. 602 ; Citizens’ Right of Way Co. v. Ayers, 32 Ida. 206 , 179 Pac. 954 ; Citizens’ Right of Way Co. v. Pollard, 32 Ida. 212 , 180 Pac. 259 .)
The evidencé contained in the record is conflicting. There is ample evidence to support the findings of the trial court. The judgment is affirmed. Costs awarded to respondents.
Morgan, C. J., and Budge, J., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.