Keating v. McGivney
THOMAS KEATING v. J. P. McGIVNEY and MARGARET E. McGIVNEY
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
DUNN, J.
— The appeal in this case was dismissed for failure to file transcript in time, and petition for rehearing has been filed by appellant.
This case is in all respects similar to the case of Utana Mining Corp. v. Salmon River Power & Light Co., ante, *798 p. 793, 218 Pac. 789 , and for the reasons stated in that opinion the petition for rehearing in this case is denied.
Budge, C. J., and McCarthy and William A. Lee, JJ., concur. WM. E. LEE, J.
— I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Utana Mining Corp. v. Salmon River Power & Light Co., ante, p. 793, 218 Pac. 789 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.