TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fox-Knapp, Inc., and Cable Industries, Inc. v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company

FOX-KNAPP, INC., and Cable Industries, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee

Fox-Knapp, Inc. v. Employers Mut. Cas. Co., 893 F.2d 14 (2d Cir. 1989)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 22, 1989
Docket
Nos. 353, Docket 89-7505
Judges
Feinberg, Lumbard, Meskill, Per Curiam
Citations
893 F.2d 141989 WL 1555231989 U.S. App. LEXIS 19543

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

This appeal raises the question whether, under New York law, certain actions taken by an insurance company requiring the insured claimants to produce documents and submit to an examination under oath after the expiration of the period provided in the policy for the filing of lawsuits constitute a waiver of the company’s limitations defense. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Haight, J., granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment based on plaintiffs’ late filing of the lawsuit and dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint seeking recovery under an insurance policy for property damage and business interruption losses caused by a fire in plaintiffs’ business premises.

We conclude that the defendant did not waive its limitations defense, as a matter of law, by putting plaintiffs to the expense of submitting to examination under oath and producing documents after expiration of the limitations period.

We affirm the judgment for the reasons stated by Judge Haight in his Memorandum Opinion and Order dated April 14, 1989, filed April 19, 1989, and reported at 725 F.Supp. 706 (S.D.N.Y.1989).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1992: 22019: 12020: 119922026peak 1992 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. U S West Financial Services, Inc. v. Tollman786 F. Supp. 333 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)
  2. Visconti v. Consolidated Rail Corp.801 F. Supp. 1200 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)
  3. Stout v. City of TukwilaNo. 2:18-cv-01687 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 27, 2019)
  4. Wahl v. The Boeing CompanyNo. 2:20-cv-00467 (W.D. Wash. June 12, 2020)

Most recent

  1. Wahl v. The Boeing CompanyNo. 2:20-cv-00467 (W.D. Wash. June 12, 2020)
  2. Stout v. City of TukwilaNo. 2:18-cv-01687 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 27, 2019)
  3. Visconti v. Consolidated Rail Corp.801 F. Supp. 1200 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)
  4. U S West Financial Services, Inc. v. Tollman786 F. Supp. 333 (S.D.N.Y. 1992)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Fox-Knapp, Inc. v. Employers Mut. Cas. Co., 725 F. Supp. 706 (S.D.N.Y. 1989) 5

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list