TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lester v. Eli Lilly & Co.

Lester (Dina) v. Eli Lilly & Company, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., Richardson Merrill Company, Abbott Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., the Upjohn Company, Dexter Corporation

Lester v. Eli Lilly & Co., 893 F.2d 1340 (10th Cir. 1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 3, 1990
Docket
No. 88-2582
Citations
893 F.2d 13401990 WL 3681990 U.S. App. LEXIS 59

Opinion

893 F.2d 1340

Lester (Dina) v. Eli Lilly & Company, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., Richardson Merrill Company, Abbott Laboratories, Merck & Co., Inc., The Upjohn Company, Dexter Corporation

NO. 88-2582

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

JAN 03, 1990

Appeal From: D.Kan., 698 F.Supp. 843 1

AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1991: 119912026peak 1991 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Alexander v. Beech Aircraft Corp.952 F.2d 1215 (10th Cir. 1991)

Most recent

  1. Alexander v. Beech Aircraft Corp.952 F.2d 1215 (10th Cir. 1991)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Lester v. Eli Lilly, 698 F. Supp. 843 (D. Kan. 1988) 4
Rickman (Michael) v. Cone Mills Corp., Cone Mills Mktg. Co., Sampson (Ben), Tesher (Donald W.), Vetack (Richard), 893 F.2d 1340 (10th Cir. 1989) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list