Sullivan v. George Ringler & Co.
John J. Sullivan, as Surviving Trustee under the Last Will and Testament of John J. Worden v. George Ringler & Company
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Goodrich, P. J.:
The only question involved in this appeal is whether a. judgment between the same parties-on the same subject-matter is res adjudícala after an appeal from the judgment has been taken and an undertaking given to stay execution.
This question must be decidéd in the affirmative, on the authority of Parkhurst v. Berdell ( 110 N. Y. 386 ), where (at p. 392) it was said: “ As it appears to have been material to establish in this action some of the matters adjudicated in that in favor' of -Hrs. Parkhurst, it was competent for her to establish them by the judgment-roll introduced in evidence. But that judgment was rendered in Septeniber, 1878, and before the trial of this action an appeal had been taken to the General Term. That is all that appeared upon the trial of this action. But the appeal did not suspend the operation of the - judgment as an estoppel.” (See, also, similar *389 doctrine declared in Stevens v. Stevens, 69 Hun, 332, 336 , and Sage v. Harpending, 49 Barb. 174 .)
The .judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
All concurred.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals1
- Federal District Courts2
- Bankruptcy Courts1
- State Appellate Courts3
- State Trial Courts2
- State Specialty Courts3
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.