People v. Hale
The People of the State of New York v. William H. Hale
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Hirschberg, P. J.:
The defendant was charged with a violation of the provisions of section 1188 of the amended charter of the city of New York (Laws of 1901, chap. 466), in refusing permission to a sanitary inspector of the department of health to enter and examine the premises of the defendant' as to their sanitary condition. The papers on appeal state that the demurrer was overruled without, written order, and that the appeal is taken from the oral order so overruling the demurrer. Aside from the question of the validity of the act which the defendant is charged with transgressing,- and which is not considered, no authority for the practice adopted by the appellant is known to the court and none is furnished in the brief. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed, but without costs. . - -
Jeers, Bure, Thomas and Garb, JJ., concurred.
.Appeal dismissed, without costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.