TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Probate of a Paper Writing Purporting to be the Last Will & Testament of Robinson

In the Matter of the Probate of a Paper Writing Purporting to Be the Last Will and Testament of Mary S. Robinson, Burton C. Meighan, as of, and Burton C. Meighan and Frank B. Upham, the Trustees Named in the Last Will and Testament of Mary S. Robinson, Appellants Ida Stevens Halsted and Otheman Abel Stevens

In re the Probate of a Paper Writing Purporting to be the Last Will & Testament of Robinson, 145 A.D. 925 (1911)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 15, 1911
Judges
Carr, Jenks, Rich, Thomas, Woodward
Citations
145 A.D. 925130 N.Y.S. 259
Headnotes
Trust — spendthrift ti-Ust—accumulation of income.
Summary
Appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on March 6, 1911.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

We agree with the determination of the surrogate of Westchester county that the attempted trust set forth in the 8th, 9th and 10th clauses of the will in question is void. We think, however, that the trust attempted to be created in the 6th and 7th clauses of the will is valid. Thi s trust does not direct any accumulation of income, but because it makes any payment of income or from the corpus absolutely dependent upon the discretion of the trustees under defined conditions, it may be said that it sanctions an accumulation of income during a period which is not measured by a minority. To' this extent the accumulation would be unlawful. Under these circumstances, the. accumulation, if any resulted, would go to those entitled to the next eventual estate, who in this case, as the will is now construed, would be the next of kin of the testatrix. The trust in question can continue, however, certainly as to the corpus of the trust fund during the period defined by the will. In this respect the trust in question is quite similar to the class, well recognized as valid, known as “spendthrift trusts.” We think that Holland v. Alcock ( 108 N. Y. 312 ), cited by the learned surrogate, * does not apply here, for in that case there were no definito beneficiaries of the attempted trust, while here the contemplated beneficiaries aré fully defined by the will as being the next of kin of the testatrix. The decree of the Surrogate’s Court should be so modified as to declare valid the trust set forth in the 6th and 7th clauses of the will, and as so modified affirmed, with costs and disbursements of the appeal payable out of the estate to all the parties who have filed briefs on this appeal.

Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Woodward and Rich, JJ.', concurred.

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county mo'dified so as to declare valid the trust set forth in the 6th and 7th clauses of the will, and as so modified affirmed, with costs and disbursements of the appeal payable out of the estate to all the parties who have filed briefs on this appeal.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1916: 11946: 119162026peak 1916 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Pruyn v. Sears96 Misc. 200 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1916)
  2. In re the Estate of Buell198 Misc. 358 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1946)

Most recent

  1. In re the Estate of Buell198 Misc. 358 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1946)
  2. Pruyn v. Sears96 Misc. 200 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1916)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Holland v. Alcock, 16 N.E. 305 (N.Y. 1888) 102

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list