Wickhiller v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
Conrad Wickhiller v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company and Manhattan Railway Company
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam:
On an examination of the facts of this case we are satisfied that the rental' damage should be restricted to a period subsequent to the opening to the public of the subway, viz., June 10, 1905. The judgment is, therefore, modified by striking out the allowance for rental damage prior to that date and as modified affirmed, without costs. Present— Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Judgment modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.