TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Telestar, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Western Tele-Communications, Inc.

Telestar, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 899 F.2d 1268 (D.C. Cir. 1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 19, 1990
Docket
No. 88-1834
Citations
899 F.2d 1268283 U.S. App. D.C. 2831990 WL 475841990 U.S. App. LEXIS 6260
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

899 F.2d 1268 283 U.S.App.D.C. 283

Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. TELESTAR, INC., Appellant, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, Appellee, Western Tele-Communications, Inc., Intervenor.

No. 88-1834.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 19, 1990.

Before MIKVA, BUCKLEY and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This case was considered on the record on appeal from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 14(c). It is 2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the appeal be dismissed for lack of standing. Appellant has not demonstrated an injury fairly traceable to the FCC's allegedly illegal conduct and likely to be redressed by the relief requested. See, e.g., Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 751 (1984); Orange Park Florida T.V., Inc. v. FCC, 811 F.2d 664, 673 (D.C.Cir.1987). Even if this court were to reverse the FCC order under review, and require a revocation of intervenor Western Tele-Communications, Inc.'s operating authority, appellant is not presently a competitor in the field of communications services or even a potential competitor. Appellant has been denied an FCC license, in a decision affirmed by this court, see TeleSTAR, Inc. v. FCC, Nos. 88-1420 et al. (D.C.Cir. Sept. 22, 1989), reh'g denied (D.C.Cir. Nov. 27, 1989), and the likelihood that it would be eligible for a license in the near future is far from certain.

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Strang v. Desio, 899 F.2d 1268 (D.C. Cir. 1990) 1
Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737 (1984) 4,208
Orange Park Fla. T v. Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Clay Television, Inc., 811 F.2d 664 (D.C. Cir. 1987) 29

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list