TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Constantino v. Watson Contracting Co.

Rosina Constantino, as Administratrix, etc. v. Watson Contracting Company, Impleaded with Another

Constantino v. Watson Contracting Co., 163 A.D. 939 (1914)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 15, 1914
Citations
163 A.D. 939
Summary
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 13th day of May, 1913, upon a verdict, and also from an order entered on the 6th day of June, 1913, denying a motion for a new trial.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam:

There was no evidence to justify the jury in finding that

the defendant was guilty of negligence. The judgment and order appealed from are, therefore, reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed. Order to be settled on notice.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list