Mitchell v. Mitchell
Bertram Mitchell v. Michael Mitchell, Individually and as Guardian of Bertram Mitchell
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Laughlin, J.:
This appeal presents no question with respect to the Statute of Limitations, but otherwise the facts and questions involved are the same as those presented on the appeal in the action by Leon Mitchell against the same defendant ( 170 App. Div. 452 ), argued and decided herewith, and, therefore, for the reasons assigned in the opinion in the other case the judgment herein should be reversed and an interlocutory judgment entered for an accounting, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott and Smith, JJ., concurred.
Judgment reversed and judgment ordered for an accounting, with costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.