United States v. Enrique Mendoza, Jr.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Enrique MENDOZA, Jr., Defendant/Appellant
Opinion
ORDER The opinion filed November 17,1989, 890 F.2d 176 (9th Cir.1989) and amended March 16, 1990 is withdrawn and vacated. The mandate issued on April 10, 1990 is recalled.
SO ORDERED.
ORDER We dismiss this appeal. In this appeal, Mendoza challenged the propriety of the sentencing court’s upward departure from the applicable Guideline range. In an opinion issued on November 17, 1989, and amended on March 16, 1990, we vacated that sentence and remanded for resentenc-ing. On May 1, 1990, we vacated the amended opinion with the intent of publishing a new opinion. However, on December 20, 1989, after the first opinion was issued, Mendoza was resentenced within the applicable Guideline range. Because he does not challenge the propriety of his new sentence, any discussion of the propriety of his *16 previous sentence is no longer necessary or appropriate.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.