United States v. Ronald R. Rewald
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald R. REWALD, Defendant-Appellant
Opinion
ORDER The opinion filed November 13,1989, 889 F.2d 836 (9th Cir.1989), is hereby amended as follows:
*19 The first sentence of footnote 20 shall read “Tamanaha and Levine had several run-ins with the district judge during trial, and he even cited them for contempt because of certain behavior, although all contempt charges against the two attorneys were later dismissed.”
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(affirming district 20 court decision to deny leave where moving party knew the relevant facts but waited 15 months to 21 amend)
-
(although crime occurred in isolated state of Hawaii, no prejudice because not a small or rural community)
Cited by 70 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.