McCready v. Larkin
Nathaniel L. McCready v. Edward L. Larkin, Impleaded with John A. Larkin and Thomas A. Larkin
Headnotes
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Dowling, J.:
The answer of the defendant is identical with that of his codefendant, John A. Larkin, save that it contains no counterclaim, this defendant having assigned his interest in the $2,500 demanded under the counterclaim to John A. Larkin. For the reason assigned in the opinion on the appeal of John A. Larkin ( 173 App. Div. 847 ), the judgment appealed from will be modified by decreeing that the fourth and eighth defenses contained in the second amended answer of the defendant Edward L. Larkin are sufficient in law upon the face thereof and overruling the demurrers thereto, and in other respects affirmed, with costs to appellant. The conclusions of law in the decision will be modified accordingly.
Clarke, P. J., McLaughlin, Scott and Davis, JJ., concurred.
Judgment modified as indicated in opinion and as modified affirmed, with costs to appellant. Order to be settled on notice.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.