TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ohlau v. Kleinert

In the Matter of the Application of Charles H. Ohlau and Another, for an Order of Mandamus against Albert E. Kleinert, as Superintendent of the Bureau of Buildings of the Borough of Brooklyn, City of New York

Ohlau v. Kleinert, 209 A.D. 824 (1924)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 15, 1924
Docket
No. 2
Citations
209 A.D. 824

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, on authority of appeal No. 1 (ante, p. 824), decided herewith. Present — Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Young, JJ.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1957: 119572026peak 1957 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Glenel Realty Corp. v. Worthington4 A.D.2d 702 (1957)

Most recent

  1. Glenel Realty Corp. v. Worthington4 A.D.2d 702 (1957)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list