TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

De Muth v. Butler

Before State Industrial Board, Paul De Muth v. Emily O. Butler and Another

De Muth v. Butler, 210 A.D. 505 (1924)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 13, 1924
Judges
Kellogg
Citations
210 A.D. 505206 N.Y.S. 7481924 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6773

Opinion of the Court — Kellogg

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

H. T. Kellogg, J.:

The claimant was an assistant gardener upon the premises of the employer at Scarsdale, N. Y. His hours of work were from seven-thirty in the morning to five o’clock in the afternoon every day in the week except Sunday. He boarded and lodged in a boarding house upon the premises of the employer. It was the rule of the boarding house that all employees must be in the house by ten o’clock in the evening. On Sunday, September 2, 1923, after performing certain chores, the claimant left his employer’s premises to go to New York city to get some clothes and visit a friend. He spent the day in New York and took an evening train for Scarsdale, where he arrived at about nine-thirty-five o’clock. He started to walk to his boarding house, about one mile away. While traveling upon a private road upon his employer’s premises he stepped into a hole and broke his leg. The claimant’s trip to New York was taken exclusively to satisfy his own needs and desires. His return to the premises of his employer was a part of that trip. When he *506 arrived upon the premises of his employer no duty of his employment attached. He traversed the premises in order to get to the boarding house where he would receive shelter and obtain rest and refreshment. These would gratify the needs of the body of no other person than himself. They would have been satisfied equally well by an equally good boarding house whether situate upon the premises of his employer or otherwise: No service of his employer was involved in his spending the night at the boarding house. He was, therefore, not in the course of his employment when he traversed the premises and was injured. (Matter of Daly v. Bates & Roberts, 224 N. Y. 126 .)

The award should be reversed and the claim dismissed, with costs against the Industrial Board.

All concur.

Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1925: 11929: 11941: 11944: 119252026peak 1925 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Varrelman v. Flora Logging Co.290 P. 751 (Or. 1929) · Dissent
  2. Carroll v. Westport Sanitarium39 A.2d 892 (Conn. 1944) · Dissent
  3. McWilliams Dredging Co. v. Henderson36 F. Supp. 361 (N.D. Ala. 1941)
  4. Lynch v. City of New York214 A.D. 841 (1925)

Most recent

  1. Carroll v. Westport Sanitarium39 A.2d 892 (Conn. 1944) · Dissent
  2. McWilliams Dredging Co. v. Henderson36 F. Supp. 361 (N.D. Ala. 1941)
  3. Varrelman v. Flora Logging Co.290 P. 751 (Or. 1929) · Dissent
  4. Lynch v. City of New York214 A.D. 841 (1925)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Daly v. Bates Roberts, 120 N.E. 118 (N.Y. 1918) 36

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list