TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Glenn Russell Hall, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Virginia Department of Corrections Virginia State Penitentiary R.M

Glenn Russell Hall, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia Virginia Department of Corrections Virginia State Penitentiary R.M. Muncy, Warden Toni v. Bair, Regional Administrator C.D. Mizzell, Adjustment Committee Chairman

Hall v. Va. Va. Dep't of Corr. Va. State Penitentiary R.M, 908 F.2d 967 (4th Cir. 1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 20, 1990
Docket
No. 90-6289
Citations
908 F.2d 9671990 U.S. App. LEXIS 9957
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

908 F.2d 967 Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Glenn Russell HALL, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; Virginia Department of Corrections; Virginia State Penitentiary; R.M. Muncy, Warden; Toni V. Bair, Regional Administrator; C.D. Mizzell, Adjustment Committee Chairman, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6289.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 4, 1990. Decided: June 20, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, United States Magistrate. (C/A No. 89-644-R).

Glenn Russell Hall, Jr., appellant pro se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Glenn Russell Hall, Jr. appeals from the magistrate's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Our review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hall v. Virginia, C/A No. 89-644-R (E.D.Va. Feb. 23, 1990). We deny Hall's motion for the appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list