TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Kerry Lee Nixon v. James Rector, Oceana Commissary Store, and Christopher P. Martin, Agency Representative, Department of the Navy, Navy Resale System Support, Office Commissary Division

Nixon v. Rector, 911 F.2d 723 (4th Cir. 1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 16, 1990
Docket
No. 90-2062
Citations
911 F.2d 723
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

911 F.2d 723 Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Kerry Lee NIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James RECTOR, Oceana Commissary Store, Defendant-Appellee, and Christopher P. Martin, Agency Representative, Department of the Navy, Navy Resale System Support, Office Commissary Division, Defendant.

No. 90-2062.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 1990. Decided July 19, 1990. Rehearing Denied Aug. 16, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 89-713-N)

Kerry Lee Nixon, appellant pro se.

Susan Lynn Watt, Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, * Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Kerry Lee Nixon appeals from the district court's order denying relief in his Title VII action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Nixon v. Martin, C/A No. 89-713-N (E.D.Va. Mar. 21, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

* Senior Judge Butzner recused himself from participation in this appeal. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 46 (d)

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Md. (Andrew Maurice) v. Huffman (Larry W.), Terry (Mary Sue), 911 F.2d 723 (4th Cir. 1990) 39

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list