TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Restoney Robinson v. James B. McMillan Clarence W. Burr, H.B. Griggs, Sgt., Aaron Johnson, S.E. Callahal, Sgt.

Restoney Robinson v. James B. McMillan Clarence W. Burr, H.B. Griggs, Sgt., Aaron Johnson, S.E. Callahal, Sgt., 911 F.2d 724 (4th Cir. 1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 20, 1990
Docket
No. 90-6338
Citations
911 F.2d 7241990 WL 1120631990 U.S. App. LEXIS 12193
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

911 F.2d 724 Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Restoney ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James B. McMILLAN, Clarence W. Burr, H.B. Griggs, Sgt., Aaron Johnson, S.E. Callahal, Sgt., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6338.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 1990. Decided July 20, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 89-350-P)

Restoney Robinson, appellant pro se.

W.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Restoney Robinson noted this appeal outside the 30-day appeal period established by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1), and failed to move for an extension of the appeal period within the additional 30-day period provided by Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5). The time periods established by Fed.R.App.P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Browder v. Dir., 434 U.S. 257 (1978) 3,111
United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220 (1960) 1,839

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list