TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Thomas Lee Maynard

United States v. Maynard, 911 F.2d 725 (4th Cir. 1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 22, 1990
Docket
No. 90-6569
Citations
911 F.2d 725
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

911 F.2d 725 Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas Lee MAYNARD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-6569.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 1990. Decided July 24, 1990. Rehearing Denied Aug. 22, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (C/A No. 90-401-JFM; CR No. 88-278-JFM)

Thomas Lee Maynard, appellant pro se.

Lisa M. Griffin, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Thomas Lee Maynard appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 . * Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Maynard, C/A No. 90-401-JFM; CR No. 88-278-JFM (D.Md. Apr. 17, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

* Because his petition attacks the execution of his sentence, we interpret his petition as one under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list