TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Neier v. Droesch Realty Corp.

Harry D. Neier v. Droesch Realty Corporation, Respondent Arthur Morris

Neier v. Droesch Realty Corp., 232 A.D. 534 (1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 5, 1931
Citations
232 A.D. 534250 N.Y.S. 5351931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13873

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The facts are without material dispute. The single question involved is whether petitioner by his own acts, conduct or omissions has lost his hen upon the judgments in the above-entitled action. The evidence satisfies us that the respondent, through its attorney, was not justified in paying the judgments to the plaintiff Neier personally, and that in so doing, without the knowledge or consent of the plaintiff’s attorney, it paid the judgments at its own risk and peril, and did not thereby discharge or satisfy the petitioner’s hen, which is in full force and effect and for the recovery of which the petitioner is entitled to vacate the satisfactions of the judgments and to issue execution for the enforcement of the judgments to the extent of the petitioner’s hen. (Peri v. New York Central R. R. Co., 152 N. Y. 521 .) We may add that there was neither misconduct nor neglect by the petitioner, and the payment of the judgments was not in our opinion in good faith. As to other actions in which petitioner was attorney for Neier, we hold that the value of the services therein rendered *535 may not be included in the charging hen sought to be here enforced. (Matter of Heinsheimer, 214 N. Y. 361, 365 ; Weinstein v. Seidmann, 173 App. Div. 219, 220 .)

The order denying petitioner’s motion to reject the report of the official referee and to grant the relief asked for in the petition, and the order confirming said report and dismissing the petition, should be reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and the motion granted to the extent of the hen found by the official referee to have attached to the judgments for the petitioner’s services in the action of Neier against Droesch Realty Corporation.

Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Order denying motion to reject report of official referee and to grant the relief asked for in the petition, and order confirming said report and dismissing the petition, reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and motion granted to the extent of the hen found by the official referee to have attached to the judgments for the petitioner’s services in the action of Neier against Droesch Realty Corporation. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and appropriate conclusions will be made.

Settle order on notice.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1931: 11933: 11948: 11954: 119312026peak 1931 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. In re Sebring238 A.D. 281 (1933)
  2. Dowling v. Stephan206 Misc. 518 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1954)
  3. Smith v. Young192 Misc. 897 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1948)
  4. Scheldon v. Madeo Holding Corp.234 A.D. 799 (1931)

Most recent

  1. Dowling v. Stephan206 Misc. 518 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1954)
  2. Smith v. Young192 Misc. 897 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1948)
  3. In re Sebring238 A.D. 281 (1933)
  4. Scheldon v. Madeo Holding Corp.234 A.D. 799 (1931)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
In re Heinsheimer, 108 N.E. 686 (N.Y. 1915) 116
Peri v. N.Y. Cent. & Hudson River R.R., 46 N.E. 849 (N.Y. 1897) 80
Weinstein v. Seidmann, 173 A.D. 219 (1916) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list