TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar v. B. Levens, Acting Warden, F.C.I., Butner, North Carolina, U.S. Bureau of Prisons

Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar v. B. Levens, Acting, F.C.I., Butner, N.C., U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 914 F.2d 247 (4th Cir. 1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 19, 1990
Docket
No. 89-6714
Citations
914 F.2d 2471990 WL 1345941990 U.S. App. LEXIS 25703
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

914 F.2d 247 Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Muhammad Jalal Deen AKBAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B. LEVENS, Acting Warden, F.C.I., Butner, North Carolina, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-6714.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 31, 1989. Decided Sept. 19, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. John D. Larkins, Jr., Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 89-392-CRT)

Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Akbar v. Levens, C/A No. 89-392-CRT (E.D.N.C. June 5, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list