TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Samson Electric Co. v. Buffalo Electric Co. Re-Inc.

Samson Electric Company v. Buffalo Electric Company, Re-Inc., Impleaded with Southern Surety Company of New York

Samson Elec. Co. v. Buffalo Elec. Co. Re-Inc., 234 A.D. 521 (1932)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 9, 1932
Citations
234 A.D. 521256 N.Y.S. 2191932 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10478

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The bond in suit, as well as the statute (Education Law, § 875, subd. 8, as added by Laws of 1917, chap. 786) under the authority of which it was required to be given, has as its dominant purpose the security of the promisee. The security of those furnishing labor or material to the contractor in whose welfare the promisee as a State agency is interested, is a subservient purpose. Under the language of the bond, there can be no doubt of an intention to create, within limits, a cause of action in favor of such third parties. Before such cause of action in their favor can arise, the dominant purpose must have been fulfilled. Its fulfillment is in the nature of a condition precedent, which must be pleaded as part of the cause of action. In that respect the complaint here is insufficient.

The order appealed from should be reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days.

All concur. Present — Seaes, P. J., Ceotjch, Edgcomb, Thompson and Cbosby, JJ.

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days upon payment of the costs of the motion and of this appeal.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1961: 119612026peak 1961 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list