TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Pouy v. Mandia

Marie Pouy and Others v. Maria Mandia and Anthony Mandia

Pouy v. Mandia, 234 A.D. 897 (1931)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 15, 1931
Citations
234 A.D. 897

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Judgment in so far as appealed from modified so as to extend the injunctive relief accorded herein to the bona fide tenants and guests of the owners of any portions of parcel A, and by eliminating the provision excluding tenants, lessees or licensees of said owners, aDd as so modified unanimously affirmed, without costs. The easement herein is appurtenant to the land and its beneficial enjoyment accrues not only to the owners of portions of parcel A but to bona fide tenants and guests of such owners. The regulations prescribed by the defendants to enable them to identify those who are rightfully entitled to enjoy the easement are reasonable and proper. Findings of fact and conclusions of law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions should be made in accordance herewith. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ. Settle order on notice.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1956: 11959: 11994: 12013: 119562026peak 1956 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Gowen v. Cote875 S.W.2d 637 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)
  2. Menucha of Nyack v. Fisher110 A.D.3d 1037 (2013)
  3. Brearton v. Fina3 Misc. 2d 1 (1956)
  4. H. H. Apartments, Inc. v. Beachcliff Realty Corp.8 A.D.2d 966 (1959)

Most recent

  1. Menucha of Nyack v. Fisher110 A.D.3d 1037 (2013)
  2. Gowen v. Cote875 S.W.2d 637 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)
  3. H. H. Apartments, Inc. v. Beachcliff Realty Corp.8 A.D.2d 966 (1959)
  4. Brearton v. Fina3 Misc. 2d 1 (1956)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list