TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Brian A. Brown v. Maryland Division of Parole and Probation Director, William J. Devance Ex. Assist., Director, Donald Atkinson

Brown v. Md. Div. of Parole & Prob. Dir., William J. Devance Ex. Assist., Dir., Donald Atkinson, 914 F.2d 1490 (4th Cir. 1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
September 25, 1990
Docket
No. 90-6075
Citations
914 F.2d 14901990 WL 1393601990 U.S. App. LEXIS 17046
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

914 F.2d 1490 Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Brian A. BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARYLAND DIVISION OF PAROLE AND PROBATION; Director, William J. DeVance; Ex. Assist., Director, Donald Atkinson, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-6075.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 27, 1990. Decided Sept. 25, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., District Judge. (C/A No. 87-1641-B).

Brian A. Brown, appellant pro se.

Steven Giles Hildenbrand, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Brian A. Brown appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 . Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Maryland Division of Parole and Probation, C/A No. 87-1641-B (D.Md. Apr. 4, 1990). In addition, we deny Brown's motions for copy work and for the introduction of exhibits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list