Minez v. Merrill
Julius Minez v. Charles E. Merrill and Others, as General Partners in the Limited Partnership of Merrill, Lynch & Co., and Others
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The allegations in the second cause of action are
very general and the damages for breach of the alleged agreement do not clearly arise therefrom. Therefore, inasmuch as plaintiff indicated on the argument that he desired the privilege of serving an amended pleading, the order appealed from should be modified by permitting the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days from service of the order to be entered by this court, upon payment of all costs to date, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondents.
Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.
Order entered on or about November 16, 1932, modified by permitting the plaintiff to serve - an amended complaint within twenty days from service of order upon payment of all costs to date, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the respondents.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.