Claim of Carroll v. Oates
In the Matter of the Claim of Marie Carroll, against Patrick Oates and Another, State Industrial Board
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Award in so far as it allows $527.57 for medical services, etc., is reversed and matter remitted to the State Industrial Board because of failure of proof to show that the employer refused, after request within section 13 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, to furnish such services, with costs against the Board to abide the event. In all other respects the award is affirmed. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.