Robbins v. Travelers Insurance
Louis Robbins v. The Travelers Insurance Company
Opinion of the Court
Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.
Per Curiam.
The complaint states a cause of action, at least for the amount of the disability benefits which had accrued and were unpaid at the time of the institution of the action. The order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and to vacate the attachment must, therefore, be affirmed, without consideration of the right of the plaintiff to recover the total value of the policy on the theory of anticipatory breach.
The order should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a motion by the defendant to reduce the amount of the attachment.
Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.
Order affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a motion by the defendant to reduce the amount of the attachment.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.