TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Vernon D. Hayse v. Tennessee Department of Conservation

Hayse v. Tenn. Dep't of Conservation, 915 F.2d 1571 (6th Cir. 1990)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 9, 1990
Docket
No. 89-6109
Citations
915 F.2d 1571170 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 30241990 WL 1507971990 U.S. App. LEXIS 25069
Status
Unpublished

Opinion

915 F.2d 1571

Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit. Vernon D. HAYSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-6109.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 9, 1990.

Before KEITH and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAM K. THOMAS, Senior District Judge. *

PER CURIAM.

1

Vernon D. Hayse, Jr. appeals from the district court's August 3, 1989 judgment and order entered in favor of the Tennessee Department of Conservation and its commissioner, Elbert T. Gill Jr.

2

Having carefully considered the record and the arguments presented in the briefs and orally, we find no error warranting reversal. We, therefore, AFFIRM the order of the Honorable James H. Jarvis, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, for the reasons set forth in his well-reasoned Memorandum Opinion.

* The Honorable William K. Thomas, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1998: 119982026peak 1998 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. David A. McGuire v. United Parcel Service152 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 1998)

Most recent

  1. David A. McGuire v. United Parcel Service152 F.3d 673 (7th Cir. 1998)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list