TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Stofsky v. Seigler

Pauline Stofsky and Abraham Stofsky v. Jacob Seigler and Rebecca Seigler

Stofsky v. Seigler, 241 A.D. 702 (1934)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 15, 1934
Citations
241 A.D. 702

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of evidence on the question of damages in favor of Pauline Stofsky, the amount allowed being inadequate, and on the ground that the verdict for defendants against the plaintiff husband is inconsistent with the verdict in favor of the wife, Pauline Stofsky. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Qarswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list