TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bankers Trust Co. v. Graves

In the Matter of the Application of the Bankers Trust Company and Another, as Executors and Trustees, etc., of Ephraim L. Corning, for a Mandamus Order against Mark Graves, as President of the State Tax Commission, and Others, Constituting the State Tax Commission of the State of New York

Bankers Trust Co. v. Graves, 245 A.D. 166 (1935)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 27, 1935
Citations
245 A.D. 166281 N.Y.S. 3121935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10252

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order denying peremptory mandamus to require the State Tax Commission to refund a contingent transfer tax. The testator, a resident of Connecticut, died in that State in 1924. His estate was taxed in this State on account of stocks in New York corporations. In November, 1924, under a temporary order of a New York county surrogate, $31,405.65 was assessed upon the transfer of the remainder interests under the trusts created in the will. The tax was paid on or about December 1, 1924. It was assessed at the highest rate possible under any contingency that might affect the vesting of the remainder. (Tax Law, § 230.) First National Bank v. Maine ( 284 U. S. 312 ) overruled the doctrine of Matter of Bronson ( 150 N. Y. 1 ) and Blackstone v. Miller ( 188 U. S. 189 ). No longer is a non-resident decedent’s estate taxable in this State for stocks of New York corporations. On January 3, 1934, an order was made by the New York county surrogate modifying the November, 1924, order by exempting the transfer to the remaindermen. While the order of November, 1924, was designated a temporary order, it was final, except under the contingencies enumerated in sections 225 and 230 of the Tax Law. “ Neither error nor invalidity, whether constitutional or otherwise, entering into such determination would have changed the rule of finality.” (People ex rel. International Salt Co. v. Graves, 267 N. Y. 149, 154 .)

The order should be affirmed, with costs.

Hill, P. J., Rhodes, McNamee, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, with costs.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Blackstone v. Miller, 188 U.S. 189 (1903) 257
First Nat. Bank of Boston v. Maine, 284 U.S. 312 (1932) 181
In re the Appraisal for Taxation of the Prop. of Bronson, 44 N.E. 707 (N.Y. 1896) 109
People ex rel. Int'l Salt Co. v. Graves, 196 N.E. 5 (N.Y. 1935) 18

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list