TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Braus v. Blondel's Shops, Inc.

Mortimer Braus v. Blondel's Shops, Inc.

Braus v. Blondel's Shops, Inc., 247 A.D. 209 (1936)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
April 3, 1936
Citations
247 A.D. 209286 N.Y.S. 7771936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8223

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam.

The original order provided that the entire matter be referred to a referee to assess damages. The resettled order, herein appealed from, granted plaintiff partial summary judgment In the sum of $1,350, with interest, representing weekly payments of fifty dollars each which the court considered to be absolutely due under the terms of the contract (Rider 4) and directed that as to the balance of the claim with respect to profits the action be severed.

We consider, however, that .the affidavits submitted sufficiently raise issues which require that judgment be not entered until after a full disclosure of all the facts at trial, including the ascertainment in the light of all the facts and circumstances. of the true intent of the parties and the proper construction of the clause in issue.

The order awarding partial summary judgment and severing the action as to the balance of the claim and the judgment entered thereon, should accordingly be reversed, with costs, and the motion denied.

Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Judgment and order unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motion denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1943: 119432026peak 1943 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jaeckel v. Jaeckel179 Misc. 994 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1943)

Most recent

  1. Jaeckel v. Jaeckel179 Misc. 994 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1943)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list