TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Amalithone Realty Co. v. City of New York

Amalithone Realty Co., Inc., a Domestic Corporation v. The City of New York and Russell Forbes, Commissioner of Purchase of The City of New York

Amalithone Realty Co. v. City of N.Y., 251 A.D. 450 (1937)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 22, 1937
Citations
251 A.D. 450297 N.Y.S. 2621937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6971

Opinion of the Court

Text extracted by OCR from a scanned original; check the original for exact wording.

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of Special Term as denied plaintiff an injunction pendente lite restraining defendants from awarding or performing a contract for the purchase of certain printed matter known as index books of vital *451 statistics for the department of health. Other relief was granted, but as to that no appeal was taken, and such issues are not before us.

We consider that the order, so far as appealed from, should be affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that the commissioner of purchase was vested with legal authority to award the contract on any one of the stated alternatives for which bids were asked, that the award was to the lowest bidder in one of the classes named, and that there is no claim of corruption, fraud or bad faith amounting to fraud.

Present ■—Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 119772026peak 1977 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Image Carrier Corp. v. Beame430 F. Supp. 579 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)

Most recent

  1. Image Carrier Corp. v. Beame430 F. Supp. 579 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list